Introduction
The debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump was an important political event, highlighting the clear contrasts in their ideologies, policies, and personal styles. Vice President Kamala Harris delivered a notably strong performance, making it one of the most memorable debates in recent years, leaving Trump’s supporters struggling to find any positive aspects. This analysis discusses the prime moments of the debate, the strategies employed by the debaters, and the implications of their exchanges.
Kamala Devi Harris (born October 20, 1964), daughter to a Jamaican father and an Indian-born mother, is an American politician and attorney who has been the 49th and current Vice President of the United States since 2021, serving under President Joe Biden. She has achieved the historic milestone of becoming the first woman to serve as the vice president of the United States. Her groundbreaking career includes notable roles as a former California attorney general and U.S. senator.
Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th President of the United States from 2017 to 2021. He is also a real estate developer and businessman who has owned, managed, or licensed his name to hotels, casinos, golf courses, resorts, and residential properties in New York City and internationally. Since the 1980s, Trump has lent his name to scores of retail ventures—including branded lines of clothing, cologne, food, and furniture.
Debating Styles
Kamala Harris:
- Strengths: Known for her prosecutorial background, Harris often employs an evidence-based approach. She focuses on policy details and uses a calm, composed demeanor.
- Weaknesses: Her detailed responses may seem overly technical or less relatable to the general public.
Donald Trump:
- Strengths: Trump is known for his charismatic and direct communication style. He often uses simple, memorable phrases and appeals to emotions.
- Weaknesses: His arguments can sometimes lack depth and be perceived as overly aggressive or dismissive.
Key Arguments
Opening Statements
Kamala Harris opened the debate with a focus on unity and progress. She highlighted the current administration’s achievements and emphasized the need for continued efforts in healthcare, economic recovery, and social justice. Her tone was measured, aiming to project confidence and competence.
Donald Trump opened with a critique of the current administration, focusing heavily on failures in handling the economy and foreign policy. His approach was combative, aiming to energize his base and position himself as the defender of American values.
Key Issues Discussed
- Healthcare
Healthcare was a pivotal topic, with Harris advocating for expanding the Affordable Care Act and public options to ensure coverage for all Americans. She emphasized the administration’s efforts to lower prescription drug prices and expand Medicare.
Trump countered with criticisms of “Obamacare,” labeling it as inefficient and costly. He proposed a complete healthcare system overhaul, focusing on free-market solutions and reducing government intervention. However, he didn’t get into specifics of his replacement plan.
- Economic Policy
The economy was another central theme. Harris highlighted the administration’s success in reducing unemployment rates post-pandemic and creating new jobs through infrastructure projects and green energy initiatives. She also discussed the significance of raising the minimum wage and expanding workers’ rights.
Trump argued that the economic recovery was sluggish and that the administration’s policies stifled business growth. He advocated for tax cuts, deregulation, and incentives for corporations to bring jobs back to America. His speech intended to portray himself as a champion of economic freedom and prosperity.
- Foreign Relations
Foreign policy discussions revealed sharp contrasts. Harris praised the administration’s efforts to rebuild alliances and re-engage with international organizations. She emphasized the importance of diplomacy and multilateralism in addressing global challenges like climate change and security threats.
Trump criticized these approaches as weak and ineffective. He touted his administration’s “America First” policy, highlighting achievements such as renegotiated trade deals and direct engagements with North Korea. His stance was more isolationist, focusing on projecting strength and independence on the world stage.
- Social Justice
On social justice, Harris was passionate about the need for reforms in policing, criminal justice, and systemic inequality. She brought attention to the administration’s efforts in addressing racial disparities and supporting marginalized communities through various initiatives.
Trump, however, took a law-and-order stance, emphasizing the need for robust policing and criticizing movements that he claimed fostered division and unrest. His approach was aimed at appealing to voters concerned about security and stability.
Rhetorical Strategies
Harris frequently cited data, reports, and expert opinions to back her arguments, especially around reducing black child poverty ‘by half’, creating new jobs, etc. She also used personal stories and anecdotes to connect with the audience on a human level.
Trump used repetition to reinforce key points and make them memorable. He often employed direct attacks to undermine Harris’ credibility. He also used inaccurate information, like immigrants in Ohio eating pets, statistics regarding crime in the US, etc. to invoke a reaction.
Implications for the Future
The debate highlighted the ideological divides between the two political figures and their respective parties. It underscored the contrasting visions for America’s future in healthcare, economic policy, foreign relations, and social justice.
For Harris, the debate was an opportunity to solidify her position as a key leader within the Democratic Party and as a presidential candidate. Her performance aimed to reassure supporters and sway undecided voters by presenting a vision of progress and unity.
For Trump, the debate served as a platform to reaffirm his influence within the Republican Party and to position himself for a potential presidential run in the future. His combative style and critique of the current administration were aimed at energizing his base and underscoring his commitment to his political ideals.
Audience Reactions and Media Coverage
The debate elicited strong reactions from the audience and media alike. Harris’ supporters praised her poise and clarity, viewing her performance as presidential and composed. Critics argued that she sometimes failed to counter Trump’s more aggressive tactics.
Trump’s performance was polarizing. His base appreciated his assertiveness and directness, interpreting it as strength and determination. Detractors viewed his approach as disrespectful and lacking substantive policy details.
Media coverage reflected these divided opinions, with various outlets highlighting different aspects. Some focused on Harris’ policy points and composure, while others emphasized Trump’s forceful rhetoric and critiques of the current administration
Conclusion
The Kamala Harris VS Donald Trump debate was a microcosm of the broader political landscape in the United States. It showcased the stark differences in policy and approach between the two figures and provided voters with a clear choice in terms of vision and values. As the political climate evolves, the insights gained from this debate will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping future discourse and decisions.
Works Cited
Al Jazeera Staff. “Five Takeaways from Donald Trump and Kamala Harris’s US Presidential Debate.” Al Jazeera, Al Jazeera, 11 Sept. 2024, www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/11/five-takeaways-from-donald-trump-and-kamala-harriss-us-presidential-debate
Staff, NPR. “NPR Fact Checked the Harris-Trump Presidential Debate. Here’s What We Found.” NPR, 11 Sept. 2024, www.npr.org/2024/09/11/g-s1-21932/fact-check-trump-harris-presidential-debate-2024.
KEROSKY, CHRISTOPHER A. “Kamala Harris’ Immigrant Story.” Sonoma County Gazette, 19 Aug. 2024, https://www.sonomacountygazette.com/sonoma-county-news/kamala-harris-immigrant-background-history/
Radford, Antoinette, et al. “Harris and Trump Prepare to Face off in Tonight’s Debate.” CNN, CNN, 10 Sept. 2024, www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-harris-debate-abc-09-10-24/index.html
Mangan, Dan, et al. “Presidential Debate Recap: Harris Knocks Trump over Abortion, Immigration, Crimes.” CNBC, CNBC, 10 Sept. 20244, www.cnbc.com/2024/09/10/presidential-debate-live-updates-trump-harris.html.
Brian Duignan, “Donald Trump, 45th president of the United States”. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Donald-Trump
Tracy Grant, Gregory Lewis McNamee, “Kamala Harris, 49th vice president of the United States”, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Kamala-Harris
Visual Journalism and Data teams, “US election polls: Who is ahead – Harris or Trump?” Image, https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4x71znwxdo